FAQ: What Happens to Stage Gates When Switching Methodology?
This FAQ explains what happens to your project's stage gates when you change the project's methodology. Understanding this behavior helps ensure you don't lose important historical data and can confidently update methodologies as your project evolves.
What are Stage Gates?
Stage gates are checkpoints in your project's lifecycle that help ensure your project meets specific criteria before moving to the next phase. They can be:
Approval gates that require sign-off from stakeholders
Quality gates that verify deliverables meet standards
Decision points that determine if a project should continue
Each gate has a status:
Open - The gate is active and needs to be addressed
Closed - The gate has been completed/approved
Blocking - The gate has an outstanding approval in-progress.
What Happens When I Change a Project's Methodology?
When you change a project’s methodology, all existing stage gates are retained. The system updates how those gates are positioned so that you can adopt a new methodology without ever losing approval history or audit data.
There is no scenario where an existing gate — or its approvals — is deleted as part of a methodology change.
How gates are handled
If the new methodology uses the same gates
The existing gates are reused
Each gate is aligned to the phase defined in the new methodology
The phase order is updated to reflect the new structure
All historical information is preserved, including:
Approval decisions
Approval dates
Approvers and workflows
This ensures continuity where methodologies share common governance checkpoints.
If the new methodology does not include some existing gates
Gates that were closed or pending approval are kept on the project. They are moved to the phase with the closest order in the new methodology. All approval history and decision records are therefore fully retained.
Gates that were not started are removed and replaced with the gates associated with the new methodology.
This guarantees that previously completed or in-flight approvals are never lost, even if the new methodology no longer explicitly defines those gates.
Key Benefits of This Approach
No Loss of Historical Data - Completed gates and approvals are never deleted
Continuity - Common gates between methodologies are preserved and updated
Flexibility - You can change methodologies without losing project progress
Audit Trail - Complete history of all completed gates is maintained
Smart Updates - Only relevant gates are kept; outdated ones are removed
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Will I lose my approval history if I change methodology?
A: No. All closed gates with their approval history, dates, and decision-makers are preserved.
Q: What if I change back to the original methodology?
A: The gates will be re-aligned to their corresponding phases and their status will persist.
Q: Can I change methodology multiple times?
A: Yes. Each time you change, the system preserves all gates and their status.
Q: What happens to gates that are "in progress" with partial approvals?
A: If the gate has an active approval workflow but isn't closed yet:
The gate is updated to match the new methodology
The approval workflow details are preserved
The approver assignments remain unchanged
Q: What if phases are reordered in the new methodology?
A: The phase order (which phase a gate belongs to) is automatically updated to match the new methodology's phase structure. This applies to both open and closed gates.
